For example a show called Jamaican Inn was cancelled because of one of the actors mumbling and in fact the public left over 2, 200 complaints on a website called Ofcom (The Office Of Communications) . These complaints were left after the TV show Jamaican Inn was shown again in 2014 and after the first episode the complaints started flooding in the BBC did finish playing the series for their was only three episodes that were created. However the views got lower and lower as each episode got played and from this more and more complaints was coming in. In my opinion the BBC should not have continued to play this series for people really hated it mainly because of the actor that mumbled in one of the episodes. However if it was a fairly new series that was just been released and for example the audio isn't great and they got a fair amount of complaints I think they should be given a second chance so they can learn from there mistakes and make the TV series even better so very few complaints can be published. I think this because it might have a very good plot device and to put it to waste would just be an incredible waste of money. In my conclusion I at least think most TV series should get a second chance to create another series if there quality, audio etc is bad. However they must come back and make the TV episodes to the best of their ability or else I think after they should not get another chance for they have significantly proven that they cannot improve their TV series. However may have different opinions and start to fight over whether if or not it should get a second chance.Quality & Standards
The aim of television production is to create content at it's highest quality and also the sound and picture should also be perfect so not many complaints can be published on Ofcom's (The Office Of Communications) website. However this does not always go to plan and multiple do publish about the same complaint or an entirely different one. As an example someone may complain about the sound quality but these complaints are mainly not major for it might just be a little buzz in the audio and then it will get complained about from multiple people publishing on Ofcom's website. Some viewers that watch a specific TV show will suddenly think it is bad if there has been a slight issue with the audio and quality. Some people will also start a debate on whether if a TV series should get another chance if the first one wasn't great because of the quality of the TV series for example. Also due to this fact the TV show might not of had enough money to make the TV show in the best quality, this is why on the other hand they should have another chance because they may make enough money to improve the quality of the TV series. So on the other hand they should have a chance to create a second series.
For example a show called Jamaican Inn was cancelled because of one of the actors mumbling and in fact the public left over 2, 200 complaints on a website called Ofcom (The Office Of Communications) . These complaints were left after the TV show Jamaican Inn was shown again in 2014 and after the first episode the complaints started flooding in the BBC did finish playing the series for their was only three episodes that were created. However the views got lower and lower as each episode got played and from this more and more complaints was coming in. In my opinion the BBC should not have continued to play this series for people really hated it mainly because of the actor that mumbled in one of the episodes. However if it was a fairly new series that was just been released and for example the audio isn't great and they got a fair amount of complaints I think they should be given a second chance so they can learn from there mistakes and make the TV series even better so very few complaints can be published. I think this because it might have a very good plot device and to put it to waste would just be an incredible waste of money. In my conclusion I at least think most TV series should get a second chance to create another series if there quality, audio etc is bad. However they must come back and make the TV episodes to the best of their ability or else I think after they should not get another chance for they have significantly proven that they cannot improve their TV series. However may have different opinions and start to fight over whether if or not it should get a second chance.
For example a show called Jamaican Inn was cancelled because of one of the actors mumbling and in fact the public left over 2, 200 complaints on a website called Ofcom (The Office Of Communications) . These complaints were left after the TV show Jamaican Inn was shown again in 2014 and after the first episode the complaints started flooding in the BBC did finish playing the series for their was only three episodes that were created. However the views got lower and lower as each episode got played and from this more and more complaints was coming in. In my opinion the BBC should not have continued to play this series for people really hated it mainly because of the actor that mumbled in one of the episodes. However if it was a fairly new series that was just been released and for example the audio isn't great and they got a fair amount of complaints I think they should be given a second chance so they can learn from there mistakes and make the TV series even better so very few complaints can be published. I think this because it might have a very good plot device and to put it to waste would just be an incredible waste of money. In my conclusion I at least think most TV series should get a second chance to create another series if there quality, audio etc is bad. However they must come back and make the TV episodes to the best of their ability or else I think after they should not get another chance for they have significantly proven that they cannot improve their TV series. However may have different opinions and start to fight over whether if or not it should get a second chance.